WebTV to destroy Bandwidth?
It’s an interesting question, actually. Especially since the companies using the most bandwidth are not building infrastructure, but simply paying for it. So will the infrastructure providers be able to support the massive upgrade projects that might be necessary to support these much larger data loads? Or is the whole thing simply much ado about nothing, seeing as how we’re years behind Europe and much of
I’m guessing that we’re going to need to see large-scale fiber roll-outs before we’ll be able to see a legitimate return to consistent data transfer. It might even be in industry’s best interest to form some sort of infrastructure consortium to kick-start the whole thing. Who knows. But with so much more of today’s businesses interacting over the web, if webTV takes off without an infrastructure boost, we could see a crippled internet capability for lots of businesses…
Labels: science
1 Comments:
The cable companies need to switch from broadcasting all their TV channels over their tubes to an IP based cable tv system. Currently, they're not using effective use of their bandwidth: your cable line is receiving every single channel offered by your cable company, but your cable box basically filters out all but the one you want to watch. This is crazy, and clearly not efficient from a bandwidth standpoint, but it's how it's done probably to make the distribution end simpler.
If they start serving cable tv effectively "on demand", they'll be able to cram a lot more data through the same pipes. Granted, they'll need to invest in some pretty serious switches to handle the tv switching, but I feel like they could offset that with a lot of new value added services.
Plus, maybe they could ease up on the video compression, so I can watch real HD content without fast-motion artifacts.
~> www.jedfonner.com <~
Post a Comment
<< Home